Quod quaesisti inventum est in 262 locis.

Preme hic ut KWIC videas

Hic sunt primi 25 loci inventi. Alios exhibebit nexus in ima pagina.

uestes macularentur sanguine, neue carnifices lassarentur, indumenta prius omnibus detrahebant et tunc missi carnifices singulorum brachia eleuantes figebant leniter telum in corde et extinguebant omnes. Preterea mulieres Tartarorum uirili more armis accinte in pugnam audacter ferebantur, ut uiri, he in mulieres captiuas atrotius seuiebant. Si quas enim uenustiores uultu cernebant, ex quibus zelotypie motum possent aliquatenus formidare, statim extracto gladio perimebant uel si quas uidebant ad seruiendum habiles, preciso totaliter naso, deturpata facie seruili ministerio deputabant. Pueros

Funiculus triplex difficile rumpitur 296 . De Deo supra quam licet loqui periculosum est 296 . Affectus diuinus. Ira Dei 321 . Ioth, he, uau, he, Gręce, tetragrammaton. Adonai commune est 324 . Thronus Gręce Latine sedes Dei 325 . Et caligo sub pedibus eius, quia incomprehensibilis 33l. Aspectus diuinitatis.

triplex difficile rumpitur 296 . De Deo supra quam licet loqui periculosum est 296 . Affectus diuinus. Ira Dei 321 . Ioth, he, uau, he, Gręce, tetragrammaton. Adonai commune est 324 . Thronus Gręce Latine sedes Dei 325 . Et caligo sub pedibus eius, quia incomprehensibilis 33l. Aspectus diuinitatis. Sancta

5 István Brodarics to citizens of Kassa Buda, 29 August 1512 Manuscript used: MOL, DF 270926 1. Brodarics reminds citizens of Kassa that he was of help to them in the past whenever he could be. – 2. He asks for a four-in-hand carriage from the town in recognition of his services and that it is to be sent to Buda by merchants going to the fair held at St. Nicholas Day. Prudentes et

5 István Brodarics to citizens of Kassa Buda, 29 August 1512 Manuscript used: MOL, DF 270926 1. Brodarics reminds citizens of Kassa that he was of help to them in the past whenever he could be. – 2. He asks for a four-in-hand carriage from the town in recognition of his services and that it is to be sent to Buda by merchants going to the fair held at St. Nicholas Day. Prudentes et Circumspecti Domini et Amici mihi Honorandi.

5 István Brodarics to citizens of Kassa Buda, 29 August 1512 Manuscript used: MOL, DF 270926 1. Brodarics reminds citizens of Kassa that he was of help to them in the past whenever he could be. – 2. He asks for a four-in-hand carriage from the town in recognition of his services and that it is to be sent to Buda by merchants going to the fair held at St. Nicholas Day. Prudentes et Circumspecti Domini et Amici mihi Honorandi. [1.]

Budapest, 1880, 30.; and Pierre de Ambroise Nolhac, Les correspondents d’Alde Manuce. Matériaux nouveaux d’histoire littéraire 1485–1514. Rome, 1888, 242.; In Hungarian: V. Kovács Sándor (ed.), Magyar humanisták levelei XV–XVI. század, Budapest, 1971, 558. Six years ago he left a manuscript of Janus Pannonius with a book merchant by the name of Jordan so that the latter would forward it to Aldus Manutius in order to print it. He requests Aldus to give the volume to the Hungarian King’s envoy, who is to arrive at Venice, if it has been printed.

Rome, 1888, 242.; In Hungarian: V. Kovács Sándor (ed.), Magyar humanisták levelei XV–XVI. század, Budapest, 1971, 558. Six years ago he left a manuscript of Janus Pannonius with a book merchant by the name of Jordan so that the latter would forward it to Aldus Manutius in order to print it. He requests Aldus to give the volume to the Hungarian King’s envoy, who is to arrive at Venice, if it has been printed. Excellentissime Vir, Amice Observandissime. Salutem ac prosperitatem. Iusseram cuidam librario Alemanno Iordano

this date (compare: Aldus Manutius magyar barátai, Magyar Könyvszemle, 1945, 67), and this date appears on the version that appeared in Hungarian in the volume of V. Kovács. However, this is obviously false, since we know that Fülöp Csulai Móré took the letter, and about him we know that he was received in Venice in great pomp on 7 October. (Compare: F edeles Tamás, Egy Jagelló-kori humanista pályaképe. Csulai Móré Fülöp (1476/1477–1526), Levéltári Közlemények, 2007, 60–61.) The misunderstanding stems from an incorrect resolution of the Roman-type date at the end of

of the letter. According to Roman calculation we do not add 17 days to the Kalendae, 1 October, but distract 17 days, and this is how we get the real date of the letter, 15 September. This way of dating can be reconciled with Csulai’s trip, who was already in Zengg at the end of September, where he embarked on a ship to Venice. 3  Jordan von Dinslaken, printer from Cologne. He was banned from Venice in 1520 for distributing Luther’s works. Compare: Boda Miklós, Pécs–Medvevár–Pécs. Janus Pannonius a pécsi utóélet tükrében = Bartók István, Jankovits László, Kecskeméti

1 October, but distract 17 days, and this is how we get the real date of the letter, 15 September. This way of dating can be reconciled with Csulai’s trip, who was already in Zengg at the end of September, where he embarked on a ship to Venice. 3  Jordan von Dinslaken, printer from Cologne. He was banned from Venice in 1520 for distributing Luther’s works. Compare: Boda Miklós, Pécs–Medvevár–Pécs. Janus Pannonius a pécsi utóélet tükrében = Bartók István, Jankovits László, Kecskeméti Gábor (ed.), Humanista műveltség Pannniában, Pécs, 2000, 83. 4  Brodarics

tükrében = Bartók István, Jankovits László, Kecskeméti Gábor (ed.), Humanista műveltség Pannniában, Pécs, 2000, 83. 4  Brodarics obtained doctorate in canon law in Padua sometime around 1505–1506. 5  On Brodarics’ role in the publication of Janus’ works and on the manuscript he had, see more: Boda Miklós, A „sevillai kdexek” és a Janus Pannonius-szöveghagyomány kérdőjelei, Baranyai Helytörténetírás 17–18. (1985–1986), 475–493. – More recently, gnes Ritoókné Szalay found a manuscript with Janus’ works. He established a connection between the

of Janus’ works and on the manuscript he had, see more: Boda Miklós, A „sevillai kdexek” és a Janus Pannonius-szöveghagyomány kérdőjelei, Baranyai Helytörténetírás 17–18. (1985–1986), 475–493. – More recently, gnes Ritoókné Szalay found a manuscript with Janus’ works. He established a connection between the compilation and Brodarics convincingly. Compare: Ritoókné Szalay gnes, Janus Pannonius leveleinek kézirata a Pray-gyűjteményben, Az Egyetemi Könyv tár vkönyvei, 14–15 (2011), 283–292.

István Brodarics to citizens of Kassa Pécs, 20 August 1515 Manuscript used: MOL, DF 269209 Published: Tóth-Szabó Pál, Oklevelek a kegyúri jog történetéhez, Történelmi Tár, 1903, 105–106. 1. Having heard that the position of the Provost of Jászó is vacant, he asks those in Kassa to give it to scribe Péter. Kristóf Darholczi also wrote about this to them. – 2. He and Darhoczi could have achieved with the Bishop that the Provostship goes to scribe Péter, but as advowson belongs to Kassa, they prefer to recommend their protégé to the town. – 4.

DF 269209 Published: Tóth-Szabó Pál, Oklevelek a kegyúri jog történetéhez, Történelmi Tár, 1903, 105–106. 1. Having heard that the position of the Provost of Jászó is vacant, he asks those in Kassa to give it to scribe Péter. Kristóf Darholczi also wrote about this to them. – 2. He and Darhoczi could have achieved with the Bishop that the Provostship goes to scribe Péter, but as advowson belongs to Kassa, they prefer to recommend their protégé to the town. – 4. People in Kassa should write a letter on behalf of scribe Péter, whose knowledge, morals and outstanding

7  Fülöp Csulai Móré (1476/77–1526), Humanist, Royal Secretary, later Bishop of Pécs. Csulai studied with Beroaldo in Bologna and had a friendly relationship with Aldus Manutius too. Like Brodarics, Csulai was also a protégé of Szatmári. In the first two decades of the 1500s, he visited Venice many times as Hungarian royal envoy. More on his life: Fedeles Tamás, Egy Jagelló-kori humanista pályaképe. Csulai Móré Fülöp (1476/1477–1526), Levéltári Közlemények, 2007, 35–84.

humanista a mohácsi vész korában (Kálnai Imre), Irodalomtörténeti Közlemények, 1970, 372. In Hungarian: V. Kovács Sándor, Magyar humanisták levelei XV–XVI. század, Budapest, 1971, 596. Brodarics calls Cospi’s attention to a youngster who prepares for studies in Italy, even though he is not an old acquaintance of Cospi. Eximie ac Doctissime Vir, salutem et commendationem. Etsi nulla mihi vel parva admodum cum Tua Dominatione intercessit familiaris necessitudo, qua fretus liberius illi oneris quippiam

1  Angelo Bartolomeo Cospi (1430–1516) Humanist, philologist, teacher of rhetoric at the Vienna University. 2  Giving an exact date for the letter is problematic. Sándor V. Kovács, who first published the text, dated the letter to the second half of the 1530s, because he thought that Brodarics might have got acquainted with Angelo Cospi on his trip to Italy in 1536. Regarding the fact that Cospi died in 1516, the date given by V. Kovács is obviously impossible. Cospi taught rhetoric at the University of Vienna, and it is clear that Brodarics knew him only

acquainted with Angelo Cospi on his trip to Italy in 1536. Regarding the fact that Cospi died in 1516, the date given by V. Kovács is obviously impossible. Cospi taught rhetoric at the University of Vienna, and it is clear that Brodarics knew him only slightly. However, we know about Cospi that he spent some time in Pozsony in 1515, where in the house of Girolamo Balbi he translated the Didorodus Codex (Libri duo, primus de Philippi Regis Macedoniae, aliorum re quorundam illustrium ducum, alter de Alexandri filii rebus gestis.) The translation was published after Cospi’s death, in 1516

that Cospi died in 1516, the date given by V. Kovács is obviously impossible. Cospi taught rhetoric at the University of Vienna, and it is clear that Brodarics knew him only slightly. However, we know about Cospi that he spent some time in Pozsony in 1515, where in the house of Girolamo Balbi he translated the Didorodus Codex (Libri duo, primus de Philippi Regis Macedoniae, aliorum re quorundam illustrium ducum, alter de Alexandri filii rebus gestis.) The translation was published after Cospi’s death, in 1516 in Vienna in the print-shop of Vietor. (Compare: Hermann Zsuzsa, Egy

címereslevele, Turul, 2011/1, 28. 2  Jerosin or Jarosin, Kőrös county (today: Herešin, Croatia). Relevant literature disputes that Brodarics really used the name of Jerosin, because, apart from the charter, it is never seen in his letters that survived. In a letter dated 1 October 1532., he names Polyana in Kőrös County as his ancestral estate. On the issue of title of nobility see: Kujáni Gábor, A Brodaricsok, Századok, 1913, 755–756; on Jerosin–Herešin the authority is Ranko Pavleš, who uses recent Croatian literature too. Compare: Ranko Pavleš, Koprivničko i

at a very early age, provide the strongest proofs that his date of birth should be put around 1480 instead of 1470–71. More on this: Kasza Péter, Egy karrier hajnala... 1198–1202. 5  Brodarics first studied in Padua from around 1498–99, then, after his master Giovanni Calphurnio died, he continued in Bologna with Filippo Beroaldo from 1503. Still, he obtained doctorate of canon law in Padua in 1505–1506. More on the chronology of Brodarics’ studies in Italy: Kasza Péter, Egy karrier hajnala... 1194–1198. 6  Tamás Bakócz, Archbishop of Esztergom, Patriarch of

of birth should be put around 1480 instead of 1470–71. More on this: Kasza Péter, Egy karrier hajnala... 1198–1202. 5  Brodarics first studied in Padua from around 1498–99, then, after his master Giovanni Calphurnio died, he continued in Bologna with Filippo Beroaldo from 1503. Still, he obtained doctorate of canon law in Padua in 1505–1506. More on the chronology of Brodarics’ studies in Italy: Kasza Péter, Egy karrier hajnala... 1194–1198. 6  Tamás Bakócz, Archbishop of Esztergom, Patriarch of Constantinople. patris domini

Rome, 1 September 1522 Manuscript used: MOL, DL 25663 Published: Iványi Béla, Adalékok a nemzetközi érintkezések történetéhez a Jagelló-korban, Történelmi Tár, 1906, 343–344. 1. The Pope has arrived in Rome but has not received Brodarics in a public audience yet. However, he and Cardinal Medici have put forward Louis II’s request to him in a private interview that a legate or nuncio be sent to the Nuremberg Imperial Diet. – 2. Brodarics assures King Louis that that he could find no Pope more suitable for his purposes than Adrian. Marsupino has returned from

1. The Pope has arrived in Rome but has not received Brodarics in a public audience yet. However, he and Cardinal Medici have put forward Louis II’s request to him in a private interview that a legate or nuncio be sent to the Nuremberg Imperial Diet. – 2. Brodarics assures King Louis that that he could find no Pope more suitable for his purposes than Adrian. Marsupino has returned from Florence to Rome too. Now they work together on behalf of the King. – 3. He complains that he has no money and he doesn’t get any from the Fuggers in spite of the King having instructed them to lend

Bibliographia locorum inventorum

Marulic, Marko (1450-1524) [1480]: Repertorium, versio electronica, Verborum 315700, ed. Branimir Glavicic [genus: prosa oratio - loci communes] [numerus verborum] [marul-mar-repert.xml].

Brodaric, Stjepan (1490-1539) [1505]: Epistulae, versio electronica., Verborum 166, ed. Petrus Kasza [genus: prosa oratio - epistula] [numerus verborum] [brodaric-s-epistulae.xml].

Omnes locos monstra

Preme hic ut KWIC videas